Legal Opinion
Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co. v. Wilson Jones Loose Leaf Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 7, 1920PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
I think that these patents can best be considered upon the assumption that they concern three separate inventions: First, the sheet and binder, with fixed and removable posts and open slots and closed holes; second, the W rack to be used *716with such a binder; third, the adjustability of such a rack to the horizontal and the rack with one fixed horizontal side.
Of these the first invention is described in the Wigginton patents, Nos. 1,174,458 and 1,222,705, relating to “temporary binder or loose sheet holder,” both being originally one application, filed March 19,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- T. H. Symington Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Peters v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Houser v. StarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Smyth Mfg. Co. v. SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Stevens v. Rodgers Boiler & Burner Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
3Cited by14 opinions
- Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
- International Carbonic Engineering Co. v. Natural Carbonic Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1944
- Gunter & Cooke, Inc. v. Southern Electric Service Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1966
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Fink v. V. Foscato, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.