Legal Opinion

Oxford Filing Supply Co. v. Globe-Wernicke Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 25, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge.

This is an action for patent infringement. Jurisdiction of this court arises under the United States patent laws, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1338.

Plaintiff, who is engaged in the manufacture and sale of office supplies and equipment, charges the defendant, a competitor, with having infringed plaintiff’s Patent No. 2,278,403 for a “file support”. In addition to denying infringement, the defendant claims that the patent in suit (sometimes referred to in this opinion as the Jonas patent) is an invalid combination patent because it was anticipated and because it lacked invention.

Plaint…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trans-World Display Corp. v. Mechtronics Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API