Legal Opinion
Thomas Barton v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 15, 2015No. 12-4003PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Thomas Barton appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. He contends that the State’s withholding of evidence that would have impeached the sole witness against him entitles him to relief under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and he asserts that the district court erroneously accorded deference under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AED-PA”), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, to the state trial court’s decision to the contrary. We…
3Cases cited47 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by184 opinions
- Linda Stermer v. Millicent WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Genesis Hill v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Freddie Chase v. Matt MaCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Tony Bennett v. Superintendent Graterford SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Grueninger v. Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.