Legal Opinion
South Carolina Department of Transportation v. First Carolina Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 12, 2006No. 26163PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
This case arises out of a condemnation action by South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT). First Carolina Corporation of South Carolina (First Carolina) initiated a suit to determine the value of the condemned property. After the jury returned a verdict, SCDOT moved to deposit the judgment with the court pursuant to Rule 67, SCRCP, in order to stop the accrual of post-judgment interest during SCDOT’s appeal. The trial judge granted the motion. First Carolina appealed, and we reverse.
Factual/Procedural Background
SCDOT condemned approximately eight (8) acres of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Whitner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- McClanahan Ex Rel. Richland County Landowners & Taxpayers v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Riley Stoker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Conner v. City of Forest AcresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. RevelsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Estate of Mims v. S.C. Dep't of Disabilities & Special NeedsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Shuler v. Tri-County Electric Co-Op, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007