Legal Opinion
Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. City of Bridgeton
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1995No. 66183PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AHRENS, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff Schnuck Markets, Inc., (Schnucks) challenges the validity of a municipal ordinance of Bridgeton which forbids the operation of engines or compressors on stationary trucks within one thousand feet of an occupied residential structure at night. The trial court granted Bridgeton’s motion for summary judgment against Schnucks. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
When considering appeals from summary judgments, we review the record in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rose v. City of RiversideMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Marianist Province of the U.S. v. City of KirkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Bezayiff v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Clay County Ex Rel. County Commission of Clay v. Harley & Susie Bogue, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Glenn v. City of Grant CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Carl and Janice Duffner v. City of St. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.