Kleyla v. Haskett
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Clinton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellants’ complaint seeks to set aside a judgment rendered by the Tipton Circuit Court in a drainage case.
Several irregularities are pointed out in the proceedings of the court, but these irregularities are not available in this collateral attack. It is too well settled to require the citation of authorities, that mere irregularities can not be taken advantage of in a collateral attack upon the judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction.
If the appellants’ complaint showed that the court had no jurisdiction of the cause in which the judgment was rendered it would undoubtedly be good,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Muncey v. JoestIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Cavanaugh v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. NorthIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Jackson v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Prezinger v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Tucker v. SellersIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.