Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Robert Lynch, appeals from the Order of the Commonwealth Court, which affirmed the Order entered by *121the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (“Board”). The Board reversed the referee’s decision which awarded Appellant specific loss benefits under 77 P.S. § 513(8) of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act1 for the loss of hearing in his left ear. We granted allocatur to address the question of whether an audiologist’s testimony and reports constitute medical testimony sufficient to establish a compensable injury. For the reasons that follow, we affirm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fotta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Dilkus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Pare v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rockwell International v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Haynes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Lebron v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Lynch v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. R. Jolley v. WCAB (Dallas Twp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API