Legal Opinion

Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1988No. Appeal 1761 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

In this workmen's compensation case, Harry Hill (Claimant) questions a reversal by the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) of a referees decision awarding benefits to Claimant pursuant to Section 306(c)(8) of The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §513(8). We reverse.

Claimant was employed by Latrobe Steel Corporation (Employer) for approximately 31 years as a furnace operator. The record reveals that Claimants work environment required him to be exposed to constant loud noises. On February 5,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Grabish v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Gindy Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Miller v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Armco, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. James River Corp. v. MaysCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. LTV Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Lynch v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API