Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge MIRARCHI.

Michael Haynes (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) denying his petition to review the utilization review (UR) determination. We affirm. 1

The WCJ made the following relevant factual findings. Claimant was employed by the City of Chester (Employer) as a detective. On February 4, 1995, Claimant sustained a work-related injury to his right shoulder and elbow, while removing snow from a police car, and began receiving disability benefits pursuant to a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Fotta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Topps Chewing Gum v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howrie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Altoona Wholesale Distributors v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. S.L. Brown v. WCAB (Abington Memorial Hospital)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API