Legal Opinion

Fotta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1993No. 43 W.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

The Appellant in this case is appealing the denial of his workmen’s compensation benefits. His claim was rejected by a referee who found that his disability was not attributable to an accident he had at work. That decision was affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and by the majority of a divided panel of the Commonwealth Court. However, since the record does not support the referee’s finding, we are constrained to reverse the judgment below.

The Appellant, Abraham Fotta, was employed by the U.S. Steel/USX Corporation at Maple Creek Mine for eight years.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Humphrey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 2169, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23950aCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Rost, Richard, M., Exec. v. Ford Motor Co., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Reyes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Hutz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. State Workmen's Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API