Legal Opinion
Hupp v. City of Walnut Creek
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 30, 2005No. C 03-5387 BZPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Paul Hupp filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 alleging violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, against the City of Walnut Creek and Walnut Creek Police Officer Mitchell Rebello. The complaint alleges that defendants violated plaintiffs constitutional rights by unlawfully seizing his person and vehicle and using excessive force in handcuffing him. The complaint also alleges that defendants intentionally inflicted emotional distress on plaintiff…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Little v. GoreDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Gillespie v. County of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Hupp v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.