Legal Opinion
C. B. v. City of Sonora
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 12, 2013No. 11-17454PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZILLY, Senior District Judge:
This case involves a verdict form and protracted unscripted discussions between the district judge and the jurors that were so confusing and potentially misleading as to require a new trial. This case arises out of the handcuffing and removal from school of then eleven-year-old C.B. by Sonora Police officers. Trial proceeded against City of Sonora, Sonora Chief of Police Mace McIntosh, and Sonora Police Officer Harold (Hal) Prock on four claims: false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) under state law, and unlawful…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014