Hupp v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Ass'n
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtCodrington, J.
*1303I
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Aristea Hupp (Aristea) appeals judgment entered after the trial court granted defendants Solera Oak Valley Greens Association and City of Beaumont Animal Control Officer Jack Huntsman's1 ex parte application to dismiss Aristea's first amended complaint (FAC) under the vexatious litigant provision, Code of Civil Procedure section 391.7.2 Aristea contends the trial court's order granting Solera's ex parte application to dismiss deprived her of her due process rights to notice and an opportunity to be heard. Aristea also argues Solera waived its vexatious litigant defense…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. S.M.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Bravo v. IsmajCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re BittakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Forrest v. Department of CorporationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In Re Liang-Houh ShiehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.