Hatch v. Lewis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
Jury verdict was for plaintiff for $500. On motion for new trial, the court directed additur of $2,000 (Jehl v. Southern Pac. Co., 66 Cal.2d 821 [59 Cal.Rptr. 276, 427 P.2d 988],), raising the total award to $2,500, and granted new trial, limited to the issue of damages only, if defendant did not accept the additur. Defendant did not accept, but appealed.
Although the notice of appeal runs to the judgment as well as the order granting limited new trial, appellant’s brief states that he does not prosecute the appeal from the judgment. Thus there is no attack on the adequacy of the evidence to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Cary v. WentzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Woods v. EitzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Malcomson v. PoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Groves v. Puscizna CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013