Legal Opinion

Cary v. Wentzel

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1952No. L. A. 22028PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

At about 4 o’clock on the afternoon of December 26, 1948, plaintiffs George and Mabel Cary, husband and wife, were proceeding west on Highway 41 approximately 10 miles east of Paso Robles. Mr. Cary was driving. The pavement at that point was 14 feet wide and had a center *492line that separated the highway into two lanes, for traffic in each direction. The sky was overcast and it was drizzling. For several miles they had been following, at a distance of about 100 feet, an automobile owned and being driven by defendant, Lawrence Wentzel. Defendant’s wife and child were riding with him. Both cars…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Wallace v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Keogh v. MauldingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Reynolds v. FilomeoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Beagle v. VasoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Price v. Atchison, T. & SF Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Western Electroplating Co. v. HennessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Myers v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Baxter v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API