Legal Opinion

Stankowski v. International Harvester Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 21, 1913No. Gen. No. 17,413PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Fablin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Graves

Appellee was at the time of the occurrence here involved, and for years before that time had been, an employe of appellant in its shops. In performing the duties of his employment he was accustomed to use a cold chisel. It is a matter of common knowledge that a cold chisel is a piece of steel bar sharpened and tempered at one end and used to cut iron by placing the sharpened end against the iron to be cut and striking the other end with a hammer with greater or less force, according to the size of the chisel, and the cut to be made. On the day in question appellee, while doing his customary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herricks v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Orenstein v. Boston StoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geiken v. Chicago Great Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API