Legal Opinion

Geiken v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 15, 1937No. Gen. No. 39,207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Plaintiff brought suit under the Federal Employers ’ Liability Act to recover damages for injuries sustained while working for the defendant; at the close of all the evidence the court instructed the jury to find the defendant not guilty, and plaintiff appeals.

The complaint charged that defendant negligently furnished plaintiff with a spike maul which was dangerous and defective in that the head of the maul was too highly tempered and brittle, and that in using it there was danger of chips and particles flying off it, and that while using- it a chip flew off striking plaintiff in the left eye.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Goldie v. WernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Schillinger Bros. v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hess v. RosenthalIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Herricks v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ostendorf v. BrewerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Long v. City of New BostonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Virgil v. New York, Chicago, & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Hall v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API