Legal Opinion

Herricks v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

■ Writ or Error to the Appellate Court for the Third District;—heard in that court on appeal front the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. E. R. E. Kimbrough, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The defendant in error, Clarence Herricks, suing by his next friend, recovered a judgment in the circuit court of Vermilion county against the plaintiff in error, the Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad Company, for damages resulting from the loss of an eye while employed by plaintiff in error as a helper for a blacksmith. The Appellate Court for the Third District affirmed the judgment, and we granted a writ of certiorari for the purpose of reviewing the record.

The defendant asked the court to direct a verdict of not guilty, which the court refused to do, and the refusal raises the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Cregan v. . MarstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Goldie v. WernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Webster Manufacturing Co. v. NisbettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Johnson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mattice v. KlawansIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Exchange Nat'l Bank of Chicago v. HellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. People Ex Rel. City of Leland Grove v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Cook v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. BurfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API