Legal Opinion

General Exchange Insurance Corp. v. Pellissier Square Garage

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided June 8, 1937No. Civ. A. No. 3694PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff, owner of an automobile which had been stolen, appeals from a judgment awarding possession of the car to the defendant, who holds it under a claimed lien on account of repairs and storage. ,

Section 3051, Civil Code, does not provide for a lien upon stolen property, for the repairing or storing of the same at the request of the thief. It is only because of that section that one not the owner, but the legal possessor, may subject the property to such a lien (Davenport v. Grundy Motor Sales Co., (1915) 28 Cal. App. 409 [152 Pac. 932]); otherwise the debt would have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowe v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. C. I. T. Corp. v. Biltmore GarageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. McTigue v. Arctic Ice Cream Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Davenport v. Grundy Motor Sales Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Hackett v. California LaundryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tom Growney Equipment, Inc. v. AnsleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Roy Pemberton v. James A. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. In re Midwest Livestock Commission Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API