Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Woods

California Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1893No. 19268PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action brought by livery and feed stable keepers to foreclose a lien upon a horse for the feeding of the animal. The horse was placed by defendant Woods in charge of plaintiffs, he agreeing to pay the sum of twenty dollars per month for his care and feed. At this time Woods was in. possession under a contract of purchase from the defendant, Adams, the true owner, the agreement between them being that he should have the use of the horse, and should feed and care for him, but that the title should remain in Adams until the sum agreed upon was paid; and that event never came to pass.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hegler v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Kohler v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Small v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  4. Chuch v.GarRisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Stott v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Alexander v. Mobile Auto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Neitzel v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API