Legal Opinion

Hackett v. California Laundry

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1935No. Civ. A. 2652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Plaintiff rented a furnished house to a tenant who ran up an unpaid laundry bill with defendant of $161.33. Defendant now has in its possession several bundles of laundry which were part of the furnishings of the house and owned by the plaintiff, on which, however, it claims a lien not only for laundering these particular articles but also for previously accrued charges against the tenant. Plaintiff brought this action to recover possession of these articles or the value thereof. Judgment was rendered giving defendant a lien for the entire unpaid account. From this judgment plaintiff appeals.

D…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. State Land Settlement Board v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Lowe v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. C. I. T. Corp. v. Biltmore GarageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. General Exchange Insurance Corp. v. Pellissier Square GarageAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1937
  3. Board of Trustees v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Brown v. J. E. French Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API