Legal Opinion

McTigue v. Arctic Ice Cream Supply Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1912No. Civ. No. 1103PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John J. Van Nostrand, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

Appeal from judgment and order denying motion for new trial.

In this action the plaintiff sought to recover from the defendants, Arctic Ice Cream Supply Company (a corporation) and George W. Morse, the sum of $921.35, claimed to be due to the plaintiff under the terms of an oral agreement alleged to have been entered into with the plaintiff, by the defendants Arctic Ice Cream Supply Company and Morse jointly, for the care, feed, and treatment of twelve horses belonging to the corporation, and which it was claimed were used by it in the transaction of its business at the time the indebtedness…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State ex rel. McCardy v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. De Graff v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Smith v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Fargusson v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Millsap v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Excelsior Motor Mfg. & Supply Co. v. Sound Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  3. C. I. T. Corp. v. Biltmore GarageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Ogus, Rabinovich & Ogus Co. v. Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Wake Development Co. v. O'LearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API