Hickory Furniture Mart, Inc. v. Burns
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Summary judgment was entered for plaintiff based on the conclusion that defendant was a general contractor, as defined by G.S. 87-1, and that defendant was not entitled to recover on the construction contract since he held a limited contractor’s license. G.S. 87-10 provides that the holder of a limited contractor’s license is not entitled to engage in the practice of general contracting “with respect to any single project in excess of one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars . ... ” (Before July 1974 the limitation was seventy-five thousand dollars.)
Error is assigned to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Fulton v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Holland v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roberts v. HeffnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Helms v. DawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Hodgson Construction, Inc. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Revis Sand & Stone, Inc. v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Phillips v. PartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.