Legal Opinion

Hickory Furniture Mart, Inc. v. Burns

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1976No. 7625SC564PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Summary judgment was entered for plaintiff based on the conclusion that defendant was a general contractor, as defined by G.S. 87-1, and that defendant was not entitled to recover on the construction contract since he held a limited contractor’s license. G.S. 87-10 provides that the holder of a limited contractor’s license is not entitled to engage in the practice of general contracting “with respect to any single project in excess of one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars . ... ” (Before July 1974 the limitation was seventy-five thousand dollars.)

Error is assigned to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Fulton v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Holland v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. HeffnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Helms v. DawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Hodgson Construction, Inc. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Revis Sand & Stone, Inc. v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Phillips v. PartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API