Legal Opinion

State v. Helzer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2011No. CC CFH050352; CA A133911; SC S058001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

This is a companion case to State v. Foster, 350 Or 161, 252 P3d 292 (2011), decided this date. As does the defendant in Foster, defendant in this case challenges a warrant-less search of his car, urging that an alert to the car by a drug-detection dog did not give police probable cause to search it for seizable evidence of drugs. As we will explain, we conclude that the state failed to carry its burden to establish that the dog alert in this case was sufficiently reliable to provide police with probable cause to search. We therefore reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. CoffeyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bank of Hawaii v. Davis Radio Sales & Service, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. Soto-NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Grimm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. United States v. One Million, Thirty-Two Thousand, Nine Hundred Eighty Dollars in U.S. Currency ($1,032,980.00)District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API