Legal Opinion

United States v. One Million, Thirty-Two Thousand, Nine Hundred Eighty Dollars in U.S. Currency ($1,032,980.00)

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 2, 2012No. Case No. 3:10-CV-157-VKAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

VERNELIS K. ARMSTRONG, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction is established under 28 U.S.C. § 1345 which provides that the district courts shall have original jurisdiction over all civil actions, suits or proceedings commenced by the United States. The parties consented to the undersigned conducting all proceedings and entering judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed.R.CivJP. 73.

II. Introduction

This is a forfeiture action filed pursuant to the Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 to 904. Plaintiff, United States…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. HettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API