Legal Opinion

State v. Coffey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1990No. CM 87-0204; CA A46922; SC S35817PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

In this criminal case, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant and convicted him of possession of a controlled substance. In determining whether the trial judge properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress, we must address the underlying issue of whether a judge, in reviewing an affidavit supporting an application for a search warrant, may consider the opinion of a polygraph examiner to establish the reliability of information supplied by an unnamed informant.

This case began when police sought a warrant to search defendant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. LyonOregon Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MoylettOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State of Tennessee v. Jerry Lewis TuttleTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. CastillejaOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. Carter/GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API