Grimm v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
It is undisputed that the ultimate question of probable cause to conduct a warrantless search is reviewed by an appellate court de novo ; i.e. , the standard of review for the issue of probable cause is de novo , or without deference. "In reviewing a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress, an appellate court reviews for clear error the trial court's findings of fact, and reviews without deference the trial court's application of the law to its findings of fact." Varriale v. State , 444 Md. 400 , 410, 119 A.3d 824 , 830 (2015) (citation omitted). It may be less clear, however, whether a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florida v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Glanden v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Bethesda African Cemetery Coal. v. Housing Opp. Comm.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.