Legal Opinion

Kilton v. RICHARD G. NADLER & ASSOCIATES

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1989No. C7-89-590PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

L.J. IRVINE, Judge.

Appellant Richard Nadler appeals from the judgment entered on March 27, 1989, and an order dated February 28, 1989, denying his motion for amended findings and a new trial. Nadler argues that the trial court erred in its findings and conclusions, in its ruling that he must proceed by general denial after failing to plead an affirmative defense, and in its award of attorney fees to Kilton.

Respondent Carolyn Kilton filed a notice of review challenging the portion of the judgment in which the court denied her motion to assess a penalty against Nadler and for additional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Blattner v. ForsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. RothchildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Chatfield v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Carstedt v. GrindelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emily Bahr v. Technical Consumer ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. In re Condemnation by the Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API