Legal Opinion
In re Condemnation by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 21, 1992No. Nos. C8-91-2252, C3-91-2384PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
The trial court denied the motion of appellant Franklin Corral, Inc. to compel the condemnation commissioners to consider evidence of lost going-concern value. Appellant argues that the trial court’s finding that the Corral Bar’s trade area was within a one and one-half mile radius is clearly erroneous and that the trial court misapplied the test established in City of Minneapolis v. Schutt, 256 N.W.2d 260, 265 (1977). We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant owned and operated the Corral Bar (“Corral”) located on East Franklin Avenue in Minneapolis. Minneapolis licensed Corral as an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. SaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State Highway Commission v. L & L Concession Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- City of Detroit v. Michael's PrescriptionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- City of Minneapolis v. SchuttSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority of St. Paul v. LambrechtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002