Legal Opinion

White v. Financial Guarantee Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1936No. Civ. 9976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This action was commenced against defendants Financial Guarantee Corporation, Ltd., a corporation ; Fred Rogers, and others who do not appear herein as appellants, to recover certain moneys alleged to have been obtained by said defendants from plaintiff through fraudulent representations in connection with certain brokerage transactions had with the aforesaid defendants. Joined also as a party defendant was the appellant Coast Surety Corporation, as surety for defendant Financial Guarantee Corporation, Ltd., under and by virtue of a bond executed by said surety company…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hodgkins v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Beeman v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Blumenthal v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dyke v. ZaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Register v. Roberson Const. Co., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Ira H. Shinberg v. Paul BrukCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Wilke v. Coinway, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API