Legal Opinion

Ira H. Shinberg v. Paul Bruk

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 26, 1989No. 88-2002PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Ira H. Shinberg, appeals from a summary judgment for defendant-appellee Paul Bruk. At issue is whether Shinberg is entitled to a trial on his claim that he is owed a finder’s fee by Bruk. This involves questions of law relative to real estate brokers in New Hampshire and Massachusetts.

I. FACTS

Although there is little dispute as to the facts, we are mindful of our duty to review the record in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment. Knight v. Mills, 836 F.2d 659, 664 (1st Cir.1987); Ismert & Associates v. New…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Norman Knight v. Mark J. Mills, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Latta v. KilbournSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Ismert and Associates, Inc. v. New England Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hector Santiago v. Paul J. Fenton, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Ralph Rogers v. Michael FairCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Securities Industry Association v. Michael J. Connolly, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Mutual Development Corp. v. Ward Fisher & Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  5. Colegio International Sek Puerto Rico, Inc. v. EscribáSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API