Legal Opinion
Burdick v. Takushi
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided May 10, 1990No. Civ. 86-0582 HMF, 88-0365 HMFPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ COUNTER-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ CONDITIONAL COUNTER-MOTION FOR STAY
FONG, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On May 7, 1990, the court heard oral argument on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and permanent injunctive relief and defendants’ counter-motion for summary judgment and conditional counter-motion for stay.
BACKGROUND
In June 1986, plaintiff Alan B. Burdick notified defendants, the Director of Elections and the Lieutenant Governor (who serves as the Chief…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1992
- Burdick v. TakushiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Burdick v. TakushiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Fasi v. CayetanoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.