Burdick v. Takushi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
The district court ruled that Hawaii’s lack of provision for the casting and counting of write-in votes in statewide general *471elections impermissibly infringed a Hawaii voter’s rights of expression and association as protected by the first and fourteenth amendments. The district court issued a preliminary injunction ordering Hawaii to provide for the casting and counting of write-in votes and then stayed the injunction pending appeal. We reverse.
I
The facts in this case are undisputed. In June 1986, Alan Burdick notified the Director of Elections and the Lieutenant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Thorsted v. GregoireDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Davies v. Grossmont Union High School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.