Legal Opinion

Burdick v. Takushi

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1991No. Nos. 90-15873, 90-15876 and 90-15877PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

The district court ruled that Hawaii’s lack of provision for the casting and counting of write-in votes in statewide general *471elections impermissibly infringed a Hawaii voter’s rights of expression and association as protected by the first and fourteenth amendments. The district court issued a preliminary injunction ordering Hawaii to provide for the casting and counting of write-in votes and then stayed the injunction pending appeal. We reverse.

I

The facts in this case are undisputed. In June 1986, Alan Burdick notified the Director of Elections and the Lieutenant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Thorsted v. GregoireDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
  4. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Davies v. Grossmont Union High School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API