Legal Opinion
Steven H. Caswell v. Arthur Calderon, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 18, 2004No. 02-17177PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATZ, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On this appeal from the District Court’s denial of a habeas corpus petition and denial of leave to amend the petition, we are presented with two issues. First, is the claim of petitioner Steven H. Caswell that the California Board of Prison Terms (“the Board”) violated the Ex Post Facto Clause when it calculated his term of confinement moot, because he has already served the sentence the Board initially imposed and remains in prison only because the Board subsequently rescinded his parole release date? Second, should the petitioner be granted leave to amend…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Sechrest v. IgnacioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- McMurtrey v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Jimmy D. Carty v. Craig Nelson, Warden Bill Lockyer, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Maxwell Hoffman v. Arvon J. Arave, Warden, Idaho Maximum Security Institution, Department of Correction, State of IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.