Legal Opinion
Carl D. McQuillion v. William Duncan, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 25, 2002No. 00-55182PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.
California state prisoner Carl McQuillion appeals the district court’s denial of his two consolidated petitions for writs of ha-beas corpus, brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. McQuillion alleges that his due process rights were violated when the California Board of Prison Terms, in 1994, rescinded as “improvidently granted” his parole date, which had been set in 1979. We hold that, under clearly established Supreme Court precedent, the parole scheme in California under which McQuil-lion was given his parole date in 1979 gave rise to a constitutionally…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Gonzalez-Fuentes v. MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Brian Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Rex Chappell v. R. MandevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.