Legal Opinion

City of Winner v. Bechtold Investments, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1992No. 17624PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

Bechtold Investments (Bechtold) appeals from trial court’s judgment that the City of Winner (City), South Dakota, could proceed with its condemnation for the construction of a drainage ditch on property owned by Bechtold, and the amount of just compensation awarded by trial court. We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part.

FACTS

In January, 1991, the city council of Winner passed a resolution of necessity indicating it was necessary to install a canal to carry run-off waters in order to complete City’s drainage program. One piece of property over which the drainage channel…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State Highway Commission v. BloomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hurley v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Elfring v. PatersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Insurance Agents, Inc. v. ZimmermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. South Dakota State Cement Plant Commission v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. A.P. & Sons Construction v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API