Legal Opinion

Elfring v. Paterson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1939No. File No. 8295PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts', J.

Plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of Coding-ton County, brought this action to enjoin defendant board of county commissioners, auditor and treasurer, from issuing bonds to fund the floating indebtedness of Codington ¡County.

Defendants answered, admitting that they were negotiating for the sale of bonds in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars to fund the floating indebtedness of the county under the provisions of Chapter 22, Laws 1939- The lower court entered judgmen dismissing the complaint and from this judgment plaintiff has appealed to this court.

The statute involved in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Lavin v. BaconSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Narregang v. Brown CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Krakowski v. WaskeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Rowe v. Stanley CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Nelson v. WEB Water Development Ass'n, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re the Appeal of the Sales Tax Refund Applications of Black Hills Power & Light Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. GalatiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API