Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Feldmann

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 1993No. 89-CV-0372-ST; CA A67087PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*545EDMONDS, J.

Both parties petition for reconsideration of our opinion. 120 Or App 452, 853 P2d 297 (1993). We deny plaintiffs petition. We allow defendant’s petition and adhere to our previous opinion.

Plaintiff, 21 years old, was involved in an automobile accident. It was the first time that she had ever been involved in an automobile accident. Four days after the accident, an agent of defendant’s insurance company called her and offered to settle her personal injury claim for $100 plus payment of her emergency room hospital bill in exchange for a promise to release defendant from any further…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Huffstutter v. LindOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Samuel v. FrohnmayerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Prospero Associates v. Redactron Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Sizemore v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Brookshire v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Clausen v. M/V New CarissaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hunters Ridge Condominium Ass'n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Pioneer Resources, LLC v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Murray v. LaugsandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API