Legal Opinion
Prospero Associates v. Redactron Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 29, 1983No. 80CA0993PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
Defendants, Redactron Corporation and Burroughs Corporation, appeal the trial court’s judgment that Redactron anticipato-rily breached its contract with plaintiff, Prospero Associates, and that Burroughs tortiously interfered and induced the breach. Defendants argue that the trial court erred in its findings that Redactron anticipatorily breached, that Prospero was ready, able, and willing to perform its contractual obligations, and that Burroughs tortiously interfered and induced the breach. They further argue that the trial court improperly measured damages under New York…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- First National Bank in Fort Collins v. RostekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Milau Associates, Inc. v. North Avenue Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. The Great Western Sugar CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Lee v. AiuHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Rhue v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- L.U. Cattle Co. v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.