Legal Opinion
Powerlock Systems, Inc. v. Duo-Lok, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 18, 1972No. 71-C-486PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
There are three motions before the court which will be considered in this memorandum. The plaintiff has moved to strike defenses number 14, 15 and 18 which were contained in the defendants’ answer. The defendants have moved for an order separating the trial of the issue of validity from the issues of infringement and damages. The third matter before the court is the defendants’ contention that the plaintiff’s interrogatories be quashed.
The complaint in this case alleges that the defendants have infringed the plaintiff’s patent no. 3,031,725.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Little Mule Corporation, Aluminum Products, Inc., and William E. Housel v. The Lug All CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Pappas v. Loew's Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Cale v. Outboard Marine Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Klockner H & K Machines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1996
- Powerlock Systems, Inc. v. Duo-Lok, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
- Electronic Assistance Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Amanda J. Nason v. Mrs. Myers’ Education Services Inc., et al.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
- H.H. Robertson Co. v. Bargar Metal Fabricating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.