Powerlock Systems, Inc. v. Duo-Lok, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement. In an order dated February 18, 1972, 54 F.R.D. 578, this court overruled the defendants’ objections to interrogatories propounded to them by the plaintiff. The defendants’ responses to the interrogatories are now called inadequate by the plaintiff, and it has moved for default judgment or, alternatively, for the imposition of sanctions against the defendants.
There is another motion before the court, submitted by the defendants, in which the latter seek a more definite statement of the complaint.
Althoug…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Charles Earl Jacobson v. Nick F. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Mitchell v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Danisch v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Powerlock Systems, Inc. v. Duo-Lok, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Child v. BeameDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Ransom v. VFS, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Stillman v. Edmund Scientific Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Humphreys Exterminating Co. v. PoulterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Harewood v. Sarah Allen Home for the Aged, Inc. (In Re Sarah Allen Home Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.