H.H. Robertson Co. v. Bargar Metal Fabricating Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
By virtue of the plaintiffs objections to the August 22, 1986 report and recommendation of Magistrate Charles Laurie, the Court has before it for resolution the issue of the extent to which an intervening defendant in a patent action may be subjected to discovery in the accounting phase of the litigation to determine if the intervenor is engaging in infringement conduct for which it is liable in damages in a case where the original defendant, but not the intervenor, has been found to have infringed upon the plaintiffs valid patent.
The Court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- District of Columbia v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Canadian Westinghousecompany, Ltd., Intervenor-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.