Legal Opinion

H.H. Robertson Co. v. Bargar Metal Fabricating Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 15, 1987No. C80-1166Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

By virtue of the plaintiffs objections to the August 22, 1986 report and recommendation of Magistrate Charles Laurie, the Court has before it for resolution the issue of the extent to which an intervening defendant in a patent action may be subjected to discovery in the accounting phase of the litigation to determine if the intervenor is engaging in infringement conduct for which it is liable in damages in a case where the original defendant, but not the intervenor, has been found to have infringed upon the plaintiffs valid patent.

The Court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. District of Columbia v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  5. Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Canadian Westinghousecompany, Ltd., Intervenor-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API