Legal Opinion

Everson v. J. L. Owens Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1920No. 21,537PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $2,000. The facts are stated at the beginning of the opinion. The ease was tried before Fish, J., who when plaintiff rested granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. From an order denying his motion to amend the complaint and his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover $2,000 paid for 20 shares of the capital stock of the J. L. Owens Manufacturing Company, alleging that the defendants, by false and fraudulent representations, had induced him to buy this stock in the belief that it was capital stock of the J. L. Owens Company, a different corporation, and that he had. rescinded the contract of purchase on account of this deception. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, defendants rested without offering any evidence, and made a motion for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff had failed to prove a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brighton Packing Co. v. Butchers' Slaughtering & Melting Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Clement v. British American Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Marshall v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Parsons v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. School Sisters of Notre Dame v. KusnittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manderfeld v. KrovitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Hatch v. KulickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. Jorgensen Chevrolet Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Kloppenburg v. MaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API