Kloppenburg v. Mays
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
GIVENS, J.,
Dissenting. — The ground for reversal in the majority opinion is that to support rescission of a contract for fraud in its inception, pecuniary injury must be shown and that herein none was shown.
Of the three cases cited in the opinion on this proposition White v. Kincaid, 149 N. C. 415, 63 S. E. 109, 128 Am. St. 663, 23 L. R. A., N. S., 1177, was an action by a minority stockholder to enjoin the majority from winding up and dissolving the corporation; Van Buren v. Posteraro, 45 Colo. 588, 102 Pac. 1067, 132 Am. St., 199, was a suit to restrain the enforcement of a judgment and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Urtz v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- White v. . KincaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.