Marshall v. Gilman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kerr, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after judgment ordered for defendant in an action to rescind an exchange of real estate, and for a reconveyance, etc.
1Opinion of the CourtYanderburgh, J.
1. The findings of fact by the trial court are, we think, sustained by the evidence, and warrant the judgment. This action is for a rescission of a contract for an exchange of certain real property owned by plaintiff, in the city of St. Paul, for certain lots in the city of New York, which contract has .been mutually executed by the delivery of deeds in pursuance thereof. The court finds “that said defendant, being very anxious and desirous to dispose of said property in New York City, owned as aforesaid by him, either by sale or in exchange for other property, on or about the 15th day of…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Marshall v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Anthony v. SlaydenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Burzinski v. Kinyon Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Reinertson v. StruthersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Parsons v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.