School Sisters of Notre Dame v. Kusnitt
Court of Appeals of Maryland
xlppeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City.' (Stump, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This appeal is from a judgment recovered in the Superior Court of Baltimore City by Reuben R. Kusnitt, trading as Goodyear Hospital Rubber Company, against the School Sisters of ETotre Dame, a corporation, for $900.00. The suit was on the common counts to which the defendant pleaded that “it was never indebted” and “did not promise as alleged.”
Joseph S. Holstein, the only witness for the plaintiff, testified that he was the agent of the Goodyear Hospital Rubber Company and traveled “for them,” and that on the 28th of October, 1913, he called at ETotre Dame College^ on Charles Street avenue,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Hills v. SnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Edmunds v. Merchants' Despatch Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Rodliff v. DallingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Potucek v. Cordeleria LourdesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- William Iselin & Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Gose v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Routzahn v. CromerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Standard Motor Co. v. ShockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.