Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action brought by John Anderson against the State Industrial Accident Commission. Anderson, while actually engaged in the performance of work, that he and seven others had jointly contracted to do, sustained an injury, which injury, it is stipulated, resulted in an 80 per cent permanent partial disability and loss of function of his right eye.

He presented a claim for compensation to the State Industrial Accident Commission, but the commission rejected his claim upon the ground that, at the time of the accident, he was not a workman within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Macdonald v. O'ReillyOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Scales v. First State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Oregon Fisheries Co. v. Elmore Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Fetting v. WinchOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Slade v. Utah Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. New Prime Inc. v. OliveiraSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Harris v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Landberg v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API