Legal Opinion
Mark Kroll v. United States of America and United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1995No. 93-2264PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Mark Kroll is an employee of Defendant-Appellee United States Postal Service (“USPS”), and he is appealing the district court’s dismissal of his case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Kroll has alleged at various stages of this litigation that USPS’s failure to compensate him for use of his suggestion, as required by the USPS Employee Suggestion Program (“ESP”), gave rise to various causes of action including breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and tortious conversion of his ideas without just compensation. We find that the ESP is a working condition governed by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- William Sapperstein v. Robert Hager and Patricia Hager Doing Business as B & G CycleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Rodney Harrell v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Ohio Hospital Ass'n v. ShalalaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- Ronald W. Kruse and Sylvia A. Kruse v. Village of Chagrin Falls, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Bennett v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.