Legal Opinion
Ronald W. Kruse and Sylvia A. Kruse v. Village of Chagrin Falls, Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1996No. 94-3435PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
The Kruses appeal the district court’s dismissal, for lack of jurisdiction, of their lawsuit against the Village of Chagrin Falls. Because, as we explain, the relevant facts are not in dispute and we conclude that this action is indeed ripe, we reverse the decision below and remand with instructions.
I
One afternoon in June of 1986, the Kruse family of Chagrin Falls returned home to discover, to their intense amazement and dismay, that their backyard was missing. The back of their property had been laid waste, and the family’s house was hanging at the edge of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Kuhnle Brothers, Inc. v. County of GeaugaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Gary Arnett v. Gary T. Myers, Executive Director of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Good v. Ohio Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Coles v. GranvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.