Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WATSON, Judge:
This opinion decides contested motions to compel discovery and for sanctions in a judicial review of the final results of the Department of Commerce’s review of the antidumping duty order covering color television sets from Korea.
This controversy is a good example of how the development of new technology for using, storing and transmitting information allows parties to test the rules of disclosure or discovery. It also teaches the important lesson that if these new developments are not treated with common sense and fairness they may become a threat to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Grace K. Emerick and James L. Emerick, Sr. v. Fenick Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- National Union Electric Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Jernberg Forgings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thompson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Rowe Entertainment, Inc. v. William Morris Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. v. MichelsonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
- American Brass v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.